a randomized controlled evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and demineralized freeze‑dried bone allograft
Authors
abstract
background: alveolar ridge preservation could be performed immediately following tooth extraction to limit dimensional changes of alveolar process due to bone resorption. the aim of this study was to compare the clinical and histologic outcomes of socket preservation using two different graft materials; deproteinized bovine bone mineral (dbbm) and demineralized freeze‑dried bone allograft (dfdba) with absorbable collagen membrane. materials and methods: twenty extraction sockets in 20 patients were randomly divided into 2 treatment groups: 10 sockets were augmented with dbbm and collagen membrane whereas 10 sockets were filled with dfdba and covered by collagen membrane. primary closure was achieved over extraction sockets by flap advancement. horizontal and vertical ridge dimensional changes were assessed at baseline and after 4–6 months at the time of implant placement. for histological and histomorphometrical analysis, bone samples were harvested from the augmented sites with trephine during implant surgery. all data were analyzed using spss version 18 (α=0.05). results: clinical measurements revealed that average horizontal reduction was 2.3 ± 0.64 mm for dfdba and 2.26 ± 0.51 mm for dbbm. mean vertical ridge resorption at buccal side was 1.29 ± 0.68 mm for dfdba and 1.1 ± 0.17 mm for dbbm. moreover, mean vertical ridge reduction at lingual site was 0.41 ± 0.38 mm and 0.35 ± 0.34 mm for dfdba and dbbm, respectively. no significant differences were seen between two groups in any of those clinical parameters. histologic analysis showed statistically significant more new bone deposition for dfdba compared to dbbm (34.49 ± 3.19 vs. 18.76 ± 3.54) ( p < 0.01). residual graft particles were identified significantly more in dbbm (12.77 ± 1.85) than dfdba (6.06 ± 1.02). conclusion: based on the findings of this study, both materials have positive effect on alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction, but there was more new bone formation and less residual graft particles in dfdba group than in dbbm group. key words: collagen, membrane, extraction, socket, graft, material, preservation
similar resources
A randomized controlled evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft
BACKGROUND Alveolar ridge preservation could be performed immediately following tooth extraction to limit dimensional changes of alveolar process due to bone resorption. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and histologic outcomes of socket preservation using two different graft materials; deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA...
full textComparison of Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Autograft Cancellous Bone Transplant and PRF Following Canine Tooth Extraction in Dog
Objective- Due to its specific position, the canine tooth is more exposed to the injuries, fractures and pulp necrosis. In these cases, the damaged teeth are usually pulled out. The root of this tooth is very large and sometimes extends over the premolar teeth. To extract it, a large amount of alveolar bone tissue should be harvested. Moreover, the cavity remains very large, wh...
full textHistological Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized vs. Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Background: Allografts such as demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and mineralized FDBA are commonly used by clinicians for ridge preservation procedures. The primary objective of this study is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of non-molar extraction sockets grafted with DFDBA vs. FDBA for ridge preservation. The secondary aim of this study is to compare dimensio...
full textThe preservation of alveolar bone ridge during tooth extraction.
OBJECTIVES The aims were to overview healing of extraction socket, recommendations for atraumatic tooth extraction, possibilities of post extraction socket bone and soft tissues preservation, augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search was done in Pubmed on key words in English from 1962 to December 2011. Additionally, last decades different scientific publications, books from reference list...
full textComparative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Allogenous Tooth Graft versus Free-dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study
BACKGROUND For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (ful...
full textAlveolar Ridge Preservation Using Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Bone Allograft
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) has been shown to prevent postextraction bone loss. The aim of this report is to highlight the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes following use of a bilayer xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) for ARP. Nine patients were treated after extraction of 18 teeth. Following minimal flap elevation and ...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
dental research journalجلد ۱۳، شماره ۲، صفحات ۰-۰
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023